- Apollo (1) Computers (1) India (1) Manufacturing (1) Tariffs (1) Technology (17) Trade (1) Workstations (1) đź“– Reading time 2 minutes
With the current trade war with China ostensibly over intellectual property issues there’s been a lot of discussion about how China leverages technology from elsewhere to build their own expertise. “Leverage” in this case may mean espionage, but the biggest component is, and always has been, China’s position as the global manufacturer for new technology. China is the largest manufacturer in the world, with 20% of the global market. It’s not reasonable to expect that they aren’t learning from what they build, even without government intervention.
This is hardly a new strategy, China has been playing the game of leveraging cheap labor to gain technical knowledge for a long time. In the 80’s I worked for Apollo Computer and we were eager to sell to large emerging markets like India and China. Both countries were trying to build their own manufacturing technology, so if you wanted to compete in their markets, you had to do some of your manufacturing there as well.
In India’s case, they had the technology at the time to do wave soldering and thus could build some of the boards in our computers. So we’d ship the core components and a manufacturing line would build the computers.
China did not have that ability. All they could do was assemble parts. There was no good place in our assembly line to pull out all those parts and ship them to China, so we took a different approach. We shipped fully assembled computers to Taiwan, where they were disassembled, repackaged, and sent to mainland China; there they were reassembled and sold.
From a pure frictionless market standpoint, that seems ridiculous. Why introduce inefficiencies into the process that make things artificially more expensive? But from the standpoint of two countries that were seeking to build technical expertise, those trade restrictions were brilliant moves. China used those requirements to gain expertise and climb up the supply chain. And it worked. Now they own the entire process, and every design sent to them to build becomes a new piece of knowledge they own.
It’s a little ironic that 30 years after China used carefully crafted trade restrictions to dominate global manufacturing, the U.S. is now using a trade war to try undo the results. The genie is out of the bottle. No tariff is going to keep China from learning from what they build. Nor are they going to prevent the Chinese government from slipping backdoors in critical infrastructure. If protecting our intellectual property, security, and privacy from China is the goal, then we’d be better off investing the money we’re spending on tariffs in rebuilding our own manufacturing capabilities.
Kee Hinckley
Text goes here.